After combining the three sections of the paper, it gave me an idea of how far along I am on the project. So far, I think I have enough information, but some of it might not be in the right place. For example, I mentioned something briefly in my introduction, and then explained it in detail in the lit review. I don’t know if I should take it out of the introduction and only explain it in the lit review or not. The transitions were prettymuch already made when I did each part of the paper, so I didn’t change much there. I marked the end of each section just so my peer reviewers knew, just in case my transitions are shit. I definitely need to edit the introduction some more, and probably the methods. The methods were tough because it’s basically explaining as much information as you can-without having any information. Once I have my data collected, I’ll hopefully have enough information to pound out the rest of the paper, along with some editing.
Blog 13- the unlucky one – combining intro,lit review, and methods
1 Comment »
{ RSS feed for comments on this post} · { TrackBack URI }
loopsamanthazfyp Said:
on March 30, 2010 at 3:01 am
Hey Norm,
I like how you said that after you combined the three sections that you saw how far along you are which is great. I also pretty much had my transitions already in my paper. Good idea to mark where each section ended in case your transitions suck, but I doubt that they do. Good job and keep up the good work.